Over the past several years, MEA has been successful in identifying 40 new polluted waters to be placed on the list for clean-up. Click here to review MEA’s comments on Wisconsin ’s 2002 and 2004 303(d) lists. The completeness of the 303(d) list depends on how many rivers and lakes the DNR has monitored. As of 2002, Wisconsin had only monitored 9,199 stream miles of the 84,474 stream miles in the state. In other words, only 11% of all of Wisconsin ’s waters have been monitored. Therefore, only 11% of the Wisconsin ’s stream miles are eligible for inclusion on the 303(d) list. Unfortunately, the DNR lacks the data and resources to know whether more waters should be added. For those rivers and lakes that are listed as officially polluted, the DNR is required to prepare clean up plans called Total Maximum Daily Loads or TMDL. A TMDL is defined as the sum of “waste load allocations” for point source discharges like WPDES permit holders and “load allocations” nonpoint sources like agricultural runoff. A waste load allocation is the portion of a lake or river’s pollutant loading capacity that is reserved for an existing or future WPDES permit. A load allocation is for nonpoint sources, and is the portion of a lake or river’s pollutant loading capacity from runoff, or from natural background sources of pollution. Despite that the Clean Water Act has been in effect for more than 30 years, the DNR has prepared clean up TMDLs for only a fraction of all of the polluted waters in Wisconsin. Click here to view those TMDLs. In early 2005, DNR staff said it would cost $7.5 million over 15 years (or $500,000 per year) to monitor all waters polluted by contaminants other than polychlorinated biphenols (“pcb’s”) and mercury, and then to complete TMDLs for those waters. Unfortunately, Wisconsin legislators have refused to allocate funds to clean up polluted waters. And, DNR staff say that staff levels are inadequate and that “few WDNR staff with the necessary professional training are available in the state to” prepare clean-up plans. State funds to support laboratory work are “non-existent,” etc. Click here to review the DNR’s Monitoring Strategy and go to pages 81-83 to learn more about the DNR’s lack of funding to clean up polluted rivers and lakes. |