HomeSeller
Top Homes

Click for details about this Property 3br, 1ba in Ettrick
$559,000
Kate Malles
Remax First Choice
Click for details about this Property 3br, 3ba in Black River Falls
$309,000
Jim Haldeman
Remax Homes & Hills Realty Inc.

Search More Properties


 TOP JOBS
EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Mathy Construction Company
ONLINE EDITORIAL
River Valley Newspaper Group
SPORTS WRITER
River Valley Newspaper Group
WEB DESIGNER, PROGRAMMER
Prizm Companies
SALES
Keenan's Cherryland

 TOP COUPONS
 [click to print]
Pizza King
2 Great Specials

GQ Hairstyling
50% Off Nail Services

Hair Station of La Crosse
3 Great Coupons!

Culligan
$10 per month trial or $150 trade-in



Home > Wi > Story

Published - Thursday, January 04, 2007

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (0)

52,000 gallons of oil spilled; suit challenges pipeline plan

 ADVERTISEMENT


 Section Sponsors
  Centurytel
  Downtown Dental
  Feist Dental
  Gerrard-Hoeschler
  Gundersen Lutheran
  King Furniture
  La Crosse/Onalaska Fitness
  Merchants Bank
  Midwest Toyota
  Northwest Realty
  Scrapper's Haven
  State Bank Financial
  Stock Building Supply
  Westby House Victorian Inn
.
CURTISS, Wis. (AP) — Crews have recovered thousands of gallons of crude oil that leaked in a farm field from an underground pipeline, officials said Wednesday. The accident happened only two weeks after an environmental group went to court trying to block plans for another, larger pipeline along the same route across Wisconsin.

“There is oil penetrated about an inch into the ground,” said Dave Weitz, a spokesman for the state Department of Natural Resources. “They are moving quite rapidly to clean that surface up.”

The spill, discovered Tuesday, covered about one-half acre of the field, and the environmental damage is marginal, he said.

A 4-foot crack in the Enbridge Energy Co. pipeline caused the spill, but what caused the crack remains under investigation, said Denise Hamsher, spokeswoman for the Houston-based company.

She said in a telephone interview Wednesday evening that an estimated 52,500 gallons spilled.

“We have recovered the vast majority of the crude oil,” Hamsher said. “We don’t expect an environmental impact. No rivers or drinking water or the public were affected.”

The spill occurred about five miles southwest of Curtiss in a pipeline that began carrying crude oil from Alberta, Canada, and elsewhere to refineries near Chicago in 1998, Hamsher said.

The damaged section was cut out and replaced, and the line reopened by Wednesday evening, she said. But she said it was being kept at reduced operating pressure pending the investigation into the cause.

She said the 24-inch-diameter pipe normally carries about 300,000 barrels a day. It is one of two pipelines buried at least 3 feet underground at the site of the spill, Hamsher said.

The oil spewed into a drainage area of a farm field in northeast Clark County and then flowed about a half mile before a drop in pressure shut the pipeline down and recovery crews arrived, she said.

The drainage area helped prevent the oil from spreading over more of the field, Hamsher said.

Weitz said the ground’s frozen state helped minimize damage, too.

“There is no surface water impacted. No wetlands. No flowing water,” he said. “It is not an environmental disaster.”

Hamsher said the last rupture of one of Enbridge Energy’s major pipelines occurred four years ago. The company transports 1.5 million barrels of crude oil — or 63 million gallons — a day through its pipeline network in the Upper Midwest, she said.

Two weeks ago, Midwest Environmental Advocates in Madison sued the DNR to challenge its decision to allow Enbridge Energy to install a third crude oil pipeline — this one 42 inches in diameter — along the same right of way through Wisconsin.

The lawsuit, filed in Dane County Circuit Court, contends the DNR failed to adequately address the risk of pipeline corrosion and rupture and properly review the effect the construction would have on wetlands and riverways, said Brent Denzin, an attorney for Midwest Environmental Advocates.

“Tuesday’s spill highlights the need to study the threat posed by additional Enbridge pipelines before we remove wetlands and grade riverbanks to construct them,” Denzin said in a statement.

Preliminary construction work on the project has started, but the lawsuit seeks an injunction to halt the work, Denzin said.

The DNR has not yet responded to the lawsuit so no court dates have been set, he said.

Hamsher said the company has received the necessary permits for the new pipeline and had worked with environmental agencies on the plans, which call for the line to be operational in the first quarter of 2008.

As for Tuesday’s accident, “I think it showed that the system works,” Hamsher said. “The leak detection system immediately detected the pressure drop and the pipeline was shut down.”

There won’t be any impact on waterways, and the company will work with the landowner on any damage to the land, she said.
.
Advertisement
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »


PLEASE NOTE: Comments on stories that frequently update through the day disappear with each update.
The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the La Crosse Tribune.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

We will not post reader comments containing unverifiable assertions, known falsehoods, personal attacks and insults, profanity, e-mail addresses, mailing addresses, phone numbers or Web site addresses that are for personal or promotional gain.
Thank you for your comments! Once your comments are approved, they will appear on the site.
About Us | Contact Us | Disclaimer | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | RSS | Videos | Webmaster
Copyright © 1997 - 2006 The La Crosse Tribune. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.
 


The below ads appeared in a River Valley Newspaper Group publication within the past 7 days. Please note any effective sales dates.

Click ads to enlarge