TOP JOBS
SALES CAREER
*
CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE
Ray Hutson Chevrolet Nissan
PRESS ASSISTANT
La Crosse Graphics
SITE OPERATIONS MANAGER
Badger Mining Corporation
CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT/ PROJECT MANAGER
*

HomeSeller
Top Homes

Click for details about this Property 4br, 3ba in Lacrosse
$364,900
Beth Lyden
Assist - 2 - Sell Hometowne River Realty
Click for details about this Property 4br, 3ba in Leon
$875,000
Wendy E. Struble
Gerrard - Hoeschler, Inc.

Search More Properties


 TOP COUPONS
 [click to print]
Country Kitchen
4 Great Coupons
Goodyear
Oil, Filter & Lube Special
Dee's
$109.99 Transmission Flush
Nelson Flag & Display
$5 OFF Storewide
Rocky Rococo Pizza
8 Great Coupons

Home > News > Story

Published - Wednesday, March 09, 2005

Tire plant opponents pleased

 ADVERTISEMENT
 News Section Sponsors
  Gerrard-Hoeschler
  Merchants Bank
  Ashley Furniture
  Humbird Cheese
  Centurytel
  Midwest TV & Appliance
  Country Kitchen
  Northwest Realty
.
PRESTON, Minn. — The man who would have burned 10 million tires a year in Preston, Minn., has blinked.

Faced with having to conduct an environmental impact study for his proposed tire incineration plant, Robert Maust wrote a letter to the Preston City Council saying he was canceling plans for the project. He hinted at pursuing the idea elsewhere, however.

"A comprehensive impact statement would have exposed the dangers of this plant even more than we realize today," said Ken Tschumper, a La Crescent, Minn., area farmer and member of Southeastern Minnesota Action Committee, one of three local groups that rallied grassroots support against the tire plant.

Maust's Heartland Energy LLC had planned to build the largest tire incinerator in the United States, capable of burning 375 tons of tires a day and 10 million tires annually, to generate an estimated 23 kilowatts per hour of electricity.

Tschumper thinks the cost of the environmental impact study was another key reason Maust backed away. "He told me himself an EIS would cost $500,000," Tschumper said.

In a statement released Tuesday, Tschumper's group said they were pleased by the outcome but "we can't rejoice because Bob Maust plans to do to another community what he has done to ours ... This tire burner should not be built anywhere."

Another group, Southeast-ern Minnesotans for Environmental Protection, had filed a lawsuit against the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency that gave opponents a second chance to convince the agency's citizen board to require the study.

County boards of La Crosse, Houston, Fillmore and Winona counties also approved resolutions asking for the study. U.S. Sen. Mark Dayton and various other senators, congressmen and mayors came out in opposition to the plant.

David Krotz is a reporter for the Winona (Minn.) Daily News.
.
Advertisement

About Us | Contact Us | Disclaimer | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | Webmaster
Copyright © 1997 - 2005 The La Crosse Tribune. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.