|
Wisconsin
Ag News Headlines |
 |
State DNR Board Approves Stricter Manure Regulations
Wisconsin Ag Connection - 05/25/2006
Wisconsin's largest dairy operations may soon be required to have at
least six months storage for liquid manure and have the ability to
inject its liquid manure during certain months under new rules approved
by the state's natural resources board. During the panel's meeting in
Elkhart Lake on Wednesday, board members voted unanimously for an
animal waste management plan, which the agency says will only affect
about 165 farmers in Wisconsin.
According
to the DNR, the regulations were drafted as part of an effort to reduce
manure-related problems that contaminate drinking water, kill fish and
pollute lakes and streams. The rules will govern manure management of
Wisconsin's largest farms that have at least 1,000 animal units and
generate at least 6.5 million gallons of manure a year plus other
wastes. The proposed changes are triggered by recent changes in federal
rules governing such large-scale operations, known as Concentrated
Animal Feeding Operations, or CAFOs.
Other
major changes would include a ban on spreading solid manure on frozen
or snow covered ground during February and March unless it was
immediately worked into the ground; require that manure spread on land
be set back from private and public drinking water wells and from
sinkholes and fractured bedrock; require farms to follow nutrient
management plans based on applying the right amount of phosphorus to
the soil. This nutrient, if it enters lakes and rivers, can decrease
water quality and fuel algae growth; require farms applying manure near
lakes and streams to implement practices such as leaving crop residue
on fields and limiting the amount of manure applied to protect against
manure runoff; and require farms to develop an emergency response plan
to address manure spills or discharges.
The measure now head to the Legislature, where lawmakers will have a chance to make adjustments to it.
An
estimated 80 percent of regulated farms already have such storage, and
Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio and Indiana already require at
least this much.
|