|
Task force recommendations
Here are the major recommendations made by the Manure Management Task
Force that will be submitted to the Wisconsin Department of
Agriculture, Trade, and Consumer Protection and the state Department of
Natural Resources for review:
Increase use of winter spreading plans, encourage safe manure hauling
procedures and establish emergency response plans to contain and clean
up manure spills and overflows Increase implementation of nutrient management plans through increasing funding by $7-$14 million annually
Improve knowledge about manure runoff events and their prevention
through data collection, tracking and reporting related to runoff
events from state agencies to the public Revitalize
information and education efforts by developing a statewide
notification program to alert farmers on high risk spreading conditions
such as melt periods and dry weather Encourage counties to
develop emergency response systems and farmers to prepare individual
emergency response plans to better deal with manure runoff events
Follow current regulatory paths for non-permitted livestock operations
on state and local levels to address manure runoff incidents, and
evaluate new regulations Provide funds to compensate
owners of wells contaminated by manure runoff events through revisions
to the DNR's well compensation program Develop a regional
pilot program to test the effectiveness of limited enforcement
protection and other incentives for farmers that meet environmental
standards
To view the recommendations go to http://www.manuretaskforce.wi.gov/pdf/Executive_Summary_Findings_Recommendations_Dec1.pdf.
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
Posted December 16, 2005
Manure task force plan draws criticism from farmers and residents
By Kristopher Wenn
Herald Times Reporter
MANITOWOC
— A task force's recommendations for reducing manure runoff drew
impassioned criticism on two fronts during a public hearing Thursday —
from farmers who say the plan threatens small family operations, and
from rural residents who say the recommendations are not strong enough.
About
50 people attended a forum at the University of Wisconsin-Manitowoc to
express their opinions on the state Manure Management Task Force's
recommendations for methods to reduce the risks of acute manure runoff
incidents.
In
a report for the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources and
Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection, the task
force recommends that farmers create nutrient management plans and
winter manure spreading plans, and develop emergency response plans for
manure spills to eliminate the likelihood of spills and reduce the
level of damage if they occur.
The
task force also recommends the creation of a statewide research
database on manure incidents, certification requirements for manure
haulers, improved education campaigns, and compensation for owners of
wells contaminated by manure spills.
Some
that testified at Thursday's hearing, including John Kappelman, who
manages the Meadow Brook Dairy farm with his brother Peter, said the
recommendations were common sense and he had no qualms.
However,
the majority of those who spoke either urged tougher requirements and
stiffer penalties for offenders, or expressed concern about the
recommendations' impact on family farms. Public testimony centered on
whether farmers should be allowed to spread liquid manure in winter,
when the ground is often frozen or layered with snow and is less able
to absorb the manure.
Scott
Treml of Luxemburg, in Kewaunee County, told the story of how his
family became ill after their well allegedly was contaminated by winter
liquid manure spreading on a field across the road from their house.
The Tremls filed federal and state lawsuits against Stahl Farms in June
2004, and the family eventually reached a settlement worth $380,000.
"My family lived this nightmare," he said. "It took a court order and an settlement to stop the manure spreading."
David
Pozorski, president of the Manitowoc County Lake Association, said
allowing farmers to apply liquid manure is a bad idea because the
results are fish kills, contaminated lakes and waterways. Pozorski said
many of the recommendations such as nutrient management plans and
emergency response plans should be required.
Greg
Coulthurst, who is employed at the Door County Soil and Water
Conservation Department, said the task force has fallen short in its
recommendations because they do not require penalties for spreading
manure in winter. He said Door County has dealt with manure spills for
decades, and the only viable solution in avoiding water contamination
is to prohibit winter manure spreading.
"Developing
winter spreading plans will be extremely costly, when you could just
prohibit it," he said. "Recommending winter spreading plans is going to
give people false hope."
The
cost of implementing the recommendations drew criticism from Kevin
Nysse, a director on the board of the Wisconsin Cattlemen's
Association. He said the biggest concern is that small farms can't
afford to foot the bill for the recommendations even if the state
agrees to increase funding.
"We
all love those small family farms, but they're going to be the first
ones to go because we can't afford these recommendations," he said.
The
panel heard supportive comments on some recommendations. The items that
received positive comments were a statewide certification for manure
haulers, and compensation for residents with contaminated wells.
Dale Avery, a resident of Whitelaw, said he was glad to see the well compensation since no program currently exists.
"Farmers
say they can't afford the manure shortage facilities despite cost
sharing, but how can families afford to install new wells on their
own?" he asked.
Russ
Tooley, a member of the local environmental group Centerville Cares
said the recommendations — without attached penalties — are a bunch of
"feel good" suggestions that will sit on the shelf, and the DNR should
enforce the laws already on the books.
"Can
the task force tell us the percentage of incidents that are unreported?
Can they give us a clue on the chances of a farmer being caught? And if
caught the chance he will be penalized?" he asked.
Thursday's
panel included Manitowoc County Executive Dan Fischer; Andrew Hanson,
attorney for Midwest Environmental Advocates; Kevin Erb, of the
UW-Extension; Dan Brick, Brown County farmer and member of the Dairy
Business Association; Ken Blomberg of the Rural Water Association; and
Richard Castelnuovo of DATCP.
The hearing in Manitowoc was one of three meetings held throughout the state.
The
public comment period on the recommendations has been extended until
Dec. 21. The task force will review public comments at its final
meeting Jan. 19, and finalize its recommendations based on the comments
received. The final recommendations then will be given to DATCP
Secretary Rod Nilsestuen and DNR Secretary Scott Hassett, and the two
agencies will determine how to implement the recommendations.
Kristopher Wenn: 920-686-2132 or kwenn@htrnews.com
|