Search: for:
Today
Today's Weather Image
46
Wed
Wed's Weather Image
51
Thu
Thu's Weather Image
48
Fri
Fri's Weather Image
44
News 

What do you think?
Email this story to a friend
Printer-friendly format
Tell us what you think? Write a letter to the editor

Advertisement:

More Headlines

Forums
DNR sued over oil pipeline permits
Too little study, conservationists say
By Judith Davidoff

A coalition of conservation groups filed suit this morning in Dane County Circuit Court to force the Department of Natural Resources to prepare an environmental impact statement before approving a 322-mile crude oil pipeline in Wisconsin.

The advocates say the Enbridge Energy pipeline project will disturb hundreds of acres of pristine wetlands and forest.

"This project will carve two huge trenches through 68.6 miles of wetlands and clear-cut trees and other vegetation from more than 1,200 wetland acres," Becky Abel, executive director of the Wisconsin Wetlands Association, said in a news release. "If our state natural resource agency doesn't consider impacts of this extent significant, our wetlands are really in trouble."

On Nov. 27, the DNR issued permits for wetlands and river crossings for two petroleum pipelines that would run from Superior to Delavan.

Brent Denzin, an attorney with Midwest Environmental Advocates, which filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Wetlands Association, River Alliance of Wisconsin and the St. Croix Headwaters, said the agency's finding of "no significant impact" from the proposed project allows it to go forward without completion of a full environmental impact statement.

"When you look at the record, the studies needed to adequately address the environmental impacts have not been done," Denzin said this morning.

The lawsuit is requesting that such a review be done and that any construction be delayed until the court issues its decision.

Erin Celello, spokeswoman for the DNR, said the agency's legal staff is still reviewing the complaints.

"After that, it will be sent over to the Department of Justice," she said. The justice department will represent the DNR in the lawsuit, Celello added.

But Enbridge spokeswoman Denise Hamsher said that the environmental review process has been "rigorous" and that the DNR has done a "comprehensive job."

"A very comprehensive environmental assessment has been done comparable to an environmental impact statement," Hamsher said. She added that the process has also been very open to public comment.

Hamsher said the pipeline, which is actually an expansion of two existing pipelines that cross Wisconsin, is necessary to meet the energy needs of Wisconsin citizens.

"We are expanding our pipeline to deliver and meet the demand of refineries in Chicago and beyond for increased supplies of crude oil," she said. "These are refineries that serve Wisconsin with jet fuel, gasoline and other refined petroleum products."

Hamsher said the refineries need more crude oil, and the alternative is to get it from overseas.

"They either get it from foreign countries or we tap growing supplies that are available from Canada," she said. "To get to this market you can't truck or train that much so you put them in pipelines."

E-mail: jdavidoff@madison.com
Published: December 21, 2006


Customer Service

Technical questions and suggestions may be directed to The Capital Times Web editor. Please state your concern in the subject line.

Please use our letter to the editor form for all editorial comments and suggestions.