Editorials: 'Animal units' and waste
From the Journal Sentinel
Posted: May 23, 2006
According
to the state Department of Natural Resources, between July 2004 and
June 2005, there were 52 manure spills in Wisconsin that damaged
waterways or contaminated wells; major fish kills occurred on the West
Branch of the Sugar River, the Pine River, the Jersey Valley Flowage
and other waterways. In addition, between 20 and 35 rural wells were
contaminated by manure in 2004 and 2005. In the first several months of
this year, nearly 70 wells in southern Brown County were contaminated
by bacteria, a significant number of them from manure.
The DNR has come up with a revised set of rules governing manure
management on the state's largest farms, otherwise known as
Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations, that would take a big step
toward reducing such spills and contamination. The Natural Resources
Board will consider those rules today at a meeting at Elkhart Lake; it
should not hesitate to adopt them, albeit with a few adjustments.
CAFOs are farming operations with at least 1,000 animal units -
equal to 700 mature dairy cows, 2,500 pigs or 55,000 turkeys - and that
generate at least 6.5 million gallons of manure a year plus other
wastes. Changes in federal rules governing such large operations
triggered the DNR's proposed changes to its rules, but they come none
too soon.
As more people build homes in formerly rural areas, they learn that
"the country" isn't quite the bucolic idyll they once thought. Bumping
up against farmland, suburbanites and exurbanites find that farms have
odors, noises and even worse things - such as manure spills - that they
weren't counting on. This is hardly the farmers' fault - and, after
all, they were there first - but it can lead to rising tensions.
A single cow generates as much "organic pollution," in the DNR's
gentle phrasing, as 18 people; a farm with more than 1,000 cows can
generate as much as a city the size of Sun Prairie. Placing stricter
regulations on the largest farms to reduce the odds of spills and
contamination is important for the environment and for rural
homeowners.
Among other things, the revised rules would ban CAFOs from
spreading solid manure on frozen or snow-covered ground during February
and March unless it was immediately worked into the ground, require
CAFOs to have six months' storage for liquid manure and require
farms to develop an emergency response plan to address spills or
discharges.
All of the revisions make sense, although some of them could be
implemented earlier than planned, as groups such as the Wisconsin
Wildlife Federation and Midwest Environmental Advocates are arguing.
Concerns of the Wisconsin Farm Bureau Federation also need to be
addressed; the rules should not put undue hardship on farmers.
Still, given recent history and the looming future of development, leaving things as they are is not an option.
From the May 24, 2006 editions of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
Have an opinion on this story? Write a letter to the editor or start an online forum.
Subscribe today and receive 4 weeks free! Sign up now.